Star system vs. flea market: How Apple and Google target talent

The iTunes app store has gone over 310k apps approved and has 250k apps in its catalog. The Android Market, in spite of (or perhaps because of) an abundance of copyright infringements, is growing nearly as quickly. According to at least one source, there are over 130k apps.

The way to study these two catalogs is to look at the number of new applications being approved (or added) on a monthly basis.

Even better would be to index to the same starting date, as in the following chart.

The Android Market grew grew more slowly than the iTunes store for the first two years but has accelerated to nearly the same rate now. Meanwhile, the iTunes Store has shown seasonality around the holidays (though we’ll have to see if it repeats this year) and has held fairly steady at 20k/mo.

The policies are also shifting: On one hand, Apple has also signaled that they are not willing to accept “me-too” copies of simple apps. On the other hand they clarified policies and began to allow interpreted code apps. Google has not yet reacted to infringements on its store but it’s probable that they will have to respond with some policing as download volumes grow.

The fact that the Android store is not policed or curated reduces the barrier to listing for developers and, in theory, should encourage a more rapid add rate. But the Star system of the iTunes store encourages more attempts to find hit apps. So in many ways we see that the two have an orthogonal approach:

  • The iTunes store is a hit-driven star system with long tail paid app value model
  • The Android Market is a flea market model with an ad-supported value model

There are few conclusions we can draw at this time about long term sustainability–after all these are ongoing and fairly young experiments.  It does seem that both platforms are attractive enough today to create critical masses of apps, perhaps exactly because they don’t put forward the same value model.

  • David Chu

    People can complain about Android Market or iTunes, but the smartest thing that Google did was to use a different business model. Both models have their strengths and weaknesses. I do tend to lean towards Apple because they have more experience and seem more committed to their store than Google.

    • Vertti

      Actually Apple is the only one who has a good history with its store. Everybody else are not reliable. Very good example is Microsoft (PlayForSure).

  • MattF

    I wonder how Microsoft envisions its app business model. Compete with Google by copying Apple? I'll note also that Apple's recent liberalization of app development rules means that it's now possible to write iPhone apps in Visual Studio, which strikes at the heart of MS's value model.

    • Tom

      I'm sure msft will curate more than google. Verizon curates its share of android apps. Even google will get forced into curating more to fend off legal challenges. All this, as apple is relaxing its hold some, becoming more balanced.

  • hugo

    It's also interesting to consider that Apple App Store apps can only be developed on a Mac at this point. Maybe a Windows version of Xcode & iOS SDK is Apple keeping its powder dry for a future push against Android development.

    • Nate

      Adobe has indicated that, with Apple's recent change of heart around the App Store rules, they'll be re-enabling Flash's ability to export as an iPhone app, allowing app generation completely outside of Xcode. Other toolkits will surely be coming along too, with all the developer activity…

  • Steven Noyes

    How did you pick the start date for the opening of the Market Place? I would have expected an October 2008 start date. Why the arbitrary trimming of 12 months or so?

    • Thanks for pointing out the error. I had assumed the data on was starting from launch. It's corrected now with the first 12 months or so blank for lack of data. The picture does change quite a bit…