Digitimes Research published an estimate of the allocation of production of application processors by Samsung. It suggests that Apple will transition away from Samsung as a processor supplier during 2013 and stop sourcing altogether by 2014.
Most current capacity (nearly 70%) is said to be allocated to Apple’s products. The iPhone, iPad and iPod touch consumed an estimated 226 million processors in 2012. That demand is expected to increase but it will increasingly to be met by other suppliers in 2013. However, Samsung’s own products will take up some of the slack.
The following graph shows the estimated production schedule by customer.
There are several questions that this data raises:
- Does Samsung’s microprocessor production exceed that of Intel?
- Who will produce Apple’s processors after 2013. Will it be one or more suppliers is also an open question.
- Is Apple’s CapEx (est. $10 billion/yr.) being spent on some of this future capacity? A modern fab costs about that much.
- As the iOS processors are Apple’s own designs, will Apple be integrating production and design?
Prior to his departure Intel’s Paul Otellini had begun speaking about manufacturing. He argued that the “fabless” model was no longer competitive and that design and manufacturing should be re-integrated.
I think we’re about to find out to what degree that will happen.
Shiny Things and Little App Factory are holding a sale on our iOS education and Mac media apps with deals of up to 50%. Titles include the fun new Jungle Picnic, Quick Math, the award winning RipIt and Tagalicious.
Available for a limited time only, don’t miss out!
Sponsorship by The Syndicate
A review of RIM’s latest service pricing surprise; what do maps cost and what are they worth and the way to think about Google as a business.
via 5by5 | The Critical Path #68: On Very Large Scale Integrated Companies.
If you are available January 29th and/or 30th in the San Jose area we could use your help.
We need eight people to help with registration, microphone relay, guides.
We also need five people to act as Camera Operators – we will provide Cameras and training, but any experience is a bonus.
We also need an Audio Mixer Operator – experience as a DJ is enough.
In exchange for a day of hard labor you’ll get:
- Access to event (when not busy)
- Access to reception and meals
- A collectable Asymconf t-shirt
Send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to apply.
We recommend staying at the Hayes Mansion
200 Edenvale Avenue, San Jose, CA 95136
Phone: +1 866.981.3300
The workshops will be held here on January 29th.
Three One more workshop seats are available).
Update: Workshops are sold out.
Update 2: Use this link to reserve a special event rate of $149/night. You can also reserve by calling the number above and asking for the Asymco rate.
comScore released one of its rare updates to the EU5 (Spain, UK, France, Italy and Germany) smartphone market. Note that the data is claiming to show installed base and not sales in any particular period. What interests me is a comparison or contrast between the European market and the US market.
First, total users.
The EU has about 500 million inhabitants while Europe overall has 731 million. The EU 5 total about 314 million which is very nearly the same as the US (311.6 million). Therefore the EU5 is a good comparable to the US in terms of population. As the graph above shows it’s also remarkably similar in its adoption of smartphones. Note that the scale reflects users and since the populations are very similar then the penetration should also be similar.
On Samsung’s use of Capital, Value Chain Evolution and Below the Surface. Why would you read the balance sheet of a tech company, the difference between R&D and capital spending, how to prevent suppliers becoming competitors and what are the economics of systems and application software in a device-centric model. Finally, why you shouldn’t confuse obscurity with secrecy.
via 5by5 | The Critical Path #67: Manufacturing Flying Cars.
How much does it cost to have the world’s best maps?
The answer may seem simple: $8.1 billion.
That was the cost to Nokia in cash for buying Navteq in October 2007. It would seem that buying that asset (or another one like it) is a cut-and-dried solution to anyone needing a mapping “solution”. But it’s not an answer that is either complete or explanatory of how mapping solutions are valued.
Navteq was not priced as a database for an app. It was a business which was expected to create licensing revenues and profits. The actual price for this business net of cash was $7.7 billion but the following graph shows the net sales and operating profits since Nokia began reporting its performance:
The blue area represents the difference between sales and costs and hence the operating expenses–the payments needed to “keep the lights on”.
When the iPhone 5 launched Apple promised availability in 100 countries before the end of year. This was a very aggressive plan given the gradual release of previous products. Last year the iPhone 4S only arrived in China (along with 21 additional countries) on January 13th. This year it was almost a month earlier.
Apple also announced for the first time this year first weekend sales for China: 2 million. This is, as far as I know, the first weekend sales data for a single market outside of the US. The time span was three days and therefore the daily sales rate was 2/3 million per day.
The following chart compares the launch performance for the launches which Apple reported:
If we normalize by population,
Early data shows that the PC market has not experienced a “pop” from Windows 8. Market watchers have been anticipating this pop since every previous version of Windows has led to a surge in shipments. PC vendors have also been hoping for this to lift their volumes. Volumes have been stagnant for a while, as the following chart shows:
If we combine the traditional PC and tablet markets—what I refer to as “large and medium screen PCs”— there has been growth. However the growth is all due to the tablets. When seen in a share split (blue tablets vs. brown Windows PC’s) the shift toward tablet computing is clear.