Categories

Counting stool legs

As Apple introduced a new set of revenue categories, the performance of its “minor” businesses has become clearer. The changes include re-statement of what used to be called “Software” revenues as part of iTunes. Apple Software includes sales of OS X, iWork and its pro tools. These products are now sold through the Mac App and since that is a part of iTunes its inclusion makes sense.

However, we have to understand that iTunes now is a blend of many business models. Some, like music, use a wholesale revenue recognition method and have very low to zero margins, others, like eBooks and Apps, are sold using an “agency” revenue model with potentially higher margins and some, like Software, are recognized at full value with very high margins.

When re-stated this way, iTunes becomes much more than a “break-even” business. My own estimate for its gross margin as currently reported is between 15% and 17% but it could be even higher. This allows the following picture to emerge:

Screen Shot 2013-02-11 at 2-11-12.06.08 PMThese graphs show contributions to Revenue and Gross Margins of the various reported product categories. Note that restatements for Accessories and iTunes only extend back to Q4 2010 and the older “Software” is still shown for earlier periods.

Note also that Accessories are now including some of the revenue that used to be reported as part of iPad and iPhone revenues. This was discussed in more detail here.

There are several observations we can make:

  1. iTunes now becomes a steadily and rapidly growing business. Growth over the previous two years averages well over 30% and is consistent across seasons.
  2. The absolute revenue number is substantial: $13.5 billion for 2012 (up from $10.2 billion in 2011).
  3. Assuming a gross margin of 15% to 17% yields contribution of $2 billion in margin in 2012 and $1.6 the year before.
  4. iTunes is now Apple’s fourth largest business, having overtaken the iPod in revenues two years ago
  5. iTunes growth relative to the Mac means that it could become the third largest business during this year.

When seen this way, as a percent of total, iTunes begins to look increasingly as a viable “leg stool” upon which Apple rests. Note that in the following charts the percent of total for iTunes holds steady while Mac and iPod decline.

Screen Shot 2013-02-11 at 2-11-12.24.44 PM

Adding the Accessories business (which includes Apple TV and is showing in Orange above) these “other” businesses are already bigger than the Mac. Of course, content, software, accessories and services depend on a healthy device business, but the size of these ancillaries are beginning to be substantial and Apple’s ecosystem may begin to be valued more than just as an incentive to buy the devices.

Indeed, if seen in isolation, iTunes+Accessories combined is a bigger business in terms of revenues than any of the other phone vendors except Samsung:

Screen Shot 2013-02-11 at 2-11-12.36.14 PM

 

  • Pingback: Apple Inc. (AAPL)'s Overlooked Weapon: iTunes

  • Pingback: Links for February 11th through February 15th

  • Michael Dance

    Horace, When you talk about “Assuming a gross margin of 15% to 17% yields contribution of $2 billion in margin in 2012″ I wonder how that compares to Amazon’s PBT for 2012 of $544m and net loss of $39m. I assume the other costs for iTunes (if any) were fairly low.

    • http://twitter.com/asymco Horace Dediu

      Stay tuned for a comparison of Amazon with the other “usual suspects”

  • greg

    Good analysis of the stool model as it is spot on. Some thoughts:

    1) Most consumers own more than one leg of the stool
    2) They are solidly locked into the Apple ecosystem (they are Apple repeat customers that will be difficult to move to another platform and likely to try new products)
    3) When you adopt the system you are more likely to buy another product that supports the seat (iTunes)
    4) The model supports that additional stool legs are forthcoming
    5) Current users will adopt those legs
    6) It will take something very disruptive to topple this model as iTunes will remain a viable revenue stream for years to come

    7) Apple has enough financial resources to put multiple (new product) legs in the pipeline with a solid chance that a game changer will replace weaker legs.

    This model is a MOAT and the SEAT also supports the legs. I like my Apple products most because of the SEAT and as someone else stated the value of iTunes is the real sleeper. Even if something new comes out NOT APPLE Apple users may be slow to adopt giving Apple time to react and perfect the idea.

  • Pingback: Chart of the day: Apple’s new $13.5 billion revenue stream – Fortune (blog) | DailyTechTrend